I think getting just one ballot is better. Simple and clean.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Ron Teitelbaum ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Hi All,
At the risk of annoying 100 people that have voted. I'm considering sending out the ballots again. The email will not let you vote again (if you try you will get a message that you already voted) but it will be a good reminder for those who haven't voted to vote.
Thoughts?
Ron Teitelbaum
-----Original Message----- From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev- bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Herbert König Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 4:07 PM To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
Am 31.01.2013 21:26, schrieb tim Rowledge:
98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort
of
mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get
on the
browser and VOTE.
Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll
(not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such
art that you
think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of
your life
desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish
to
avoid voting? I think not.
frightened into voting. Tough job which I wanted to avoid but with such
threats
hanging above my head...
Bet of luck to all candidates and everybody please show your support and
vote!
Cheers,
Herbert