Squeak-dev February 2013

squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org

61 participants
225 discussions

Please VOTE!!
by Ron Teitelbaum 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Hi All, So far we have 108 votes! That's 11 votes less than last election. I know we can do better than that. Please take the time to find your ballot and vote. If you need the ballot sent to you again, no problem just let me know at voters(a)squeak.org. Friday 8th of February 2013 6PM (23:00 UTC): Online election ends. The Squeak Oversight Board election ballots have gone out. Please VOTE!! It's easy to forget or lose track of the email, so please vote while you still know where the email is! The subject is: Poll: Squeak Oversight Board 2013 Sent on 28th of Jan between 5 and 6pm Eastern Time. From: andru(a)cs.cornell.edu; on behalf of; Ron Teitelbaum (CIVS poll supervisor) ron(a)usmedrec.com For more information about the election see this page: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6191 Thank you!! Ron Teitelbaum

1 0

Re: Cross-classified methods
by Stephan Eggermont 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Hmm, it was not clear in which direction this works. I switched them for http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=7379 Thanks for noting, Sean. So: the first set are methods where Squeak has no classification, and Pharo does. The second set has methods where Pharo has no classifications, and Squeak does. Stephan

2 1

last call for items to mention in the "State of Squeak" talk at FOSDEM 2013
by Craig Latta 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Hi all-- I'll be giving an overview of the state of the Squeak project on at the FOSDEM conference in Brussels on Sunday. Please let me know of anything you'd like to mention! Or rather, since time is short, please let us all know, by using this thread. thanks again! -C -- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume +31 6 2757 7177 (SMS ok) + 1 415 287 3547 (no SMS)

6 7

Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!!
by Joseph J Alotta 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

It's not that I'm apathetic, I just figure you quays are doing a great job and you know better than I do who you want to include on the team. If I vote, I may just screw things up. Can I vote to abstain? Sincerely, Joe. On Jan 31, 2013, at 4:57 PM, squeak-dev-request(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org wrote: > Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Please VOTE!! > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > <squeak-dev(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org> > Message-ID: <7ECDD4FE-04FD-4693-8904-6AD50C8E4DF2(a)rowledge.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > 98 votes is an alarmingly low turnout - how can candidates feel any sort of mandate with that level of support? Don't leave us all hanging folks - get on the browser and VOTE. > > Or I'll have to send my invisible ninja teams out to punish you. They'll (not)appear just as you drift off to sleep. They'll tickle you with such art that you think you're in paradise. And then they'll stop; you'll spend the rest of your life desperately hoping to be tickled that way again. Is it worth such anguish to avoid voting? I think not. > > tim > -- > tim Rowledge; tim(a)rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim > Useful random insult:- Several nuts over fruitcake minimum. > >

3 2

Please VOTE!!
by Ron Teitelbaum 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Hi All, So far we have 98 votes! That's 21 votes less than last election. I know we can do better than that. Please take the time to find your ballot and vote. If you need the ballot sent to you again, no problem just let me know at voters(a)squeak.org. Friday 8th of February 2013 6PM (23:00 UTC): Online election ends. The Squeak Oversight Board election ballots have gone out. Please VOTE!! It's easy to forget or lose track of the email, so please vote while you still know where the email is! The subject is: Poll: Squeak Oversight Board 2013 Sent on 28th of Jan between 5 and 6pm Eastern Time. From: andru(a)cs.cornell.edu; on behalf of; Ron Teitelbaum (CIVS poll supervisor) ron(a)usmedrec.com For more information about the election see this page: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6191 Thank you!! Ron Teitelbaum

9 9

Jump to page: