Hi Peter,
we did a MSIL to C++ backend in our LSW DotNet Reflection-Browser some years back. It avoided the need of C++ parser because we decompiled MSIL..
Just curious what it is for ? we introduced Smalltalk deompiler backend just to increase readability of .NET code for Smalltalkers.
Frank
_____
From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Peter William Lount Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:40 PM To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] C++ parser in Smalltalk?
mailto:peter@smalltalk.org peter@smalltalk.org wrote:
C/C++ to Smalltalk translator anyone?
multiple inheritance, anyone? ;-)
Have fun,
Michael
hi,
Taking back the base technologies into the fold of Smalltalk Style Systems.
Smalltalk and C were both designed with operating systems in mind.
Unix had the prevailing popular OS design.
Smalltalk Style Systems have the prevailing superior Messaging-Objects design.
Absorb and transform ALL C/C++ code into something new jettisoning the current bases in C/C++ with transformations into Smalltalk Style Systems.
Be license aware and appropriate of course.
Just a thought.
Now to try some cool visualizations of large C++ ick. Shivers.
Cheers,
Peter