At 08:40 PM 1/20/2002 +0100, Cees de Groot wrote: ...
In order to combine openness with efficiency, I've setup a mailing list for those that are directly involved with the gory details of setting up the Squeak Foundation.
....
Is that OK with everybody?
I wish you would leave this stuff on the squeakfoundation list. I don't see a need for another list at this point. If you are creating another list, please add me to it.
-Mark Schwenk WellThot Inc.
At 08:40 PM 1/20/2002 +0100, Cees de Groot wrote: ...
In order to combine openness with efficiency, I've setup a mailing list
for
those that are directly involved with the gory details of setting up the Squeak Foundation.
....
Is that OK with everybody?
Hi everybody, I believe we have too many mailing lists already. I try to subscribe to (and read, too) every relevant mailing list regarding Squeak, and until now I have: Camp Smalltalk list Camp Smalltalk ANSI list Camp Smalltalk OR list Glorp Oasis PWS Squeak foundation Squeak-dev and Squeak-announce Squeakland Stable squeak list (Plus, there is comp.lang.smalltalk)
Some of them are rather quiet (dead?), and sometimes people cross-post (ie squeak and squeakland, squeak and sqf). So, please, lets not have another one. Regards, Wolfgang
----- Original Message ----- From: Wolfgang Eder eder.wolfgang@aon.at To: squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 1:51 AM Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]sqf-formation list
Hi everybody, I believe we have too many mailing lists already. I try to subscribe to (and read, too) every relevant mailing list regarding Squeak, and until now I have: Camp Smalltalk list Camp Smalltalk ANSI list Camp Smalltalk OR list Glorp Oasis
^^^^^ Boy, does that bring back memories!
Some of them are rather quiet (dead?)
Er, pining for the fjords?
- les
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Les Tyrrell -
Mark A. Schwenk -
Wolfgang Eder