Hi guides
I want to bring up some issues about harvesting. The only thing now that I can tell is that (we discussed about that with marcus) is that there is not enough people looking at the changes and there is not enough harvesters because both of us are bad in concurrency, network, morph, etoy. Therefore we can spend hours looking at code without getting something done. So I do not really know how far we can go like that.
I was thinking that we could have tags for the enh/fix [Concurrency] [Morph] [] so that we can dispatch them to a coherent stream.
We will try with marcus to go over all the fix pending since january 2003 but I think that we should have a better commitment (easy to say).
Then there is the problem of KCP: if daniel is swamped and nobody looks at the change I do, they will not get harvested. Luckily for those one, I have the impression that this is really the space in with marcus evolve. So I do not know what to do but I have the impression that we should have a call of harvester in dedicated areas. else we will lose a lot of good stuff.
I would like from you guide to set up a focus. If you say ok guys now the key think is the babel stuff. Then let us stop the rest and fix, evaluate babel. I have the impression that if we work on target-based we can get more good feeling to have achieve something. Having no pending fix is good too but ...
stef
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org