Well, it would be interesting to write down the policy
somewhere - at
least the non obvious and the mandatory stuff. I am not
saying "Swiki"
because I am a bit tired of simply creating more and more
pages on the
Swikis, but if no other smarter way is found then sure, why not.
What's wrong with the Swiki?
Daniel
I think the main issue with the Swiki is that there is not yet a tool that allows us to easily and quickly edit the Swiki from within Squeak.
Hi all!
"Brent Vukmer" bvukmer@blackboard.com wrote:
Well, it would be interesting to write down the policy
somewhere - at
least the non obvious and the mandatory stuff. I am not
saying "Swiki"
because I am a bit tired of simply creating more and more
pages on the
Swikis, but if no other smarter way is found then sure, why not.
What's wrong with the Swiki?
Daniel
I think the main issue with the Swiki is that there is not yet a tool that allows us to easily and quickly edit the Swiki from within Squeak.
Yes, and also - creating yet another swiki page feels... Well, you know. :-)
It is just a gutfeeling I have. People discuss a problem and eventually it tends to boil down to "lets create a swiki page for that", and somehow people think it will solve things (unconsciously).
Note that I am overly negative because we have this phenomenon in our company. Sure, we love the Swiki - but too often "creating a swiki page for that" turns out to be the final thing that got done before the issue went to sleep... This is why my "gut" tells me "Oh no, not another swiki page...". :-)
So for example, if Brent had responded and said "Hey, I can add those policy rules right inside the BugFixArchiveViewer! Easily accessible!" then I would have been more interested! ;-)
regards, Göran
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 07:38 PM, goran.krampe@bluefish.se wrote:
It is just a gutfeeling I have. People discuss a problem and eventually it tends to boil down to "lets create a swiki page for that", and somehow people think it will solve things (unconsciously).
Note that I am overly negative because we have this phenomenon in our company. Sure, we love the Swiki - but too often "creating a swiki page for that" turns out to be the final thing that got done before the issue went to sleep... This is why my "gut" tells me "Oh no, not another swiki page...". :-)
You are right :) Swiki pages can only serve if they are active.
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 07:38 PM, goran.krampe@bluefish.se wrote:
It is just a gutfeeling I have. People discuss a problem and eventually it tends to boil down to "lets create a swiki page for that", and somehow people think it will solve things (unconsciously).
Note that I am overly negative because we have this phenomenon in our company. Sure, we love the Swiki - but too often "creating a swiki page for that" turns out to be the final thing that got done before the issue went to sleep... This is why my "gut" tells me "Oh no, not another swiki page...". :-)
You are right :) Swiki pages can only serve if they are active.
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Brent Vukmer -
goran.krampe＠bluefish.se -
Stephane Ducasse