If nobody has particular objections, I propose we do that next step after merging KCP, which should be after the removals.
Michael, if you can announce the update on squeak-dev, and also get a few people that have an interest to test it before we get to that point and report, that would be cool.
Daniel
Michael Rueger m.rueger@acm.org wrote:
Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
Mike, your current stance on this would be useful...
Trying to keep up ;-)
IMHO the network rewrite should go into the update stream soon (meaning: now ;-) ). As Craig wrote in another mail it basically replaces the upper layers of the network code and decouples it from the raw network access by always going through SocketStream. This should make it easier to replace the lower levels by e.g. Flow without breaking applications using the protocol clients.
I just uploaded the latest version for 3.5 (should work in 3.6 too), please check if I broke anything (new).
this effect in 3.6a, giving people time to adjust/find bugs in the core Socket, if there is any. Then we can use 3.7 to break the interface (by removing the default actions) and let people adjust the applications.
I agree with the above :-)
Regarding http: I started the rewrite, then realized that I should merge it with Comanche. Then seaside and later Comanche NG came up and I decided to wait a little to see which architecture would emerge in that context. Now might be a good time to take a look again.
Cheers
Michael
Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
Daniel Vainsencher danielv@netvision.net.il wrote:
If nobody has particular objections, I propose we do that next step after merging KCP, which should be after the removals.
Sounds fine!
Btw, later today I will be exercising the removals in the aggregated removal script and see if they all "come back" in a somewhat working state when reinstalled. I will then post about my findings and if all "looks ok" we can harvest that combo in one sweep as suggested by Doug.
Ok?
regards, Göran
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org