Is the Squeak foundation dead? How are you?! Ciao ciao!
Hi Giovanni--
Is the Squeak foundation dead?
No, it's bursting with people asking if it's still alive. :)
How are you?
Excellent! And yourself?
The way in which I'm currently contributing to the Squeak Foundation is by making the system smaller and cleaner. I spend most of my Squeak time doing this and not talking much about it. This is good because the overhead to getting things done is low, and not so good because my priorities might not be quite right (and I don't help the Squeak-Foundation-looks-dead problem). I think things will change when I get to a place where I can split up the work I'm doing.
-C
-- Craig Latta improvisational musical informaticist craig@netjam.org www.netjam.org Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
Craig Latta wrote:
Hi Giovanni--
Is the Squeak foundation dead?
No, it's bursting with people asking if it's still alive. :)
Ok, it was a stupid email ;) but I'd like to know the status of the Squeak comunity.
Excellent! And yourself?
Quite good, thank you
The way in which I'm currently contributing to the Squeak Foundation is by making the system smaller and cleaner. I spend most of my Squeak time doing this and not talking much about it. This is good because the overhead to getting things done is low, and not so good because my priorities might not be quite right (and I don't help the Squeak-Foundation-looks-dead problem). I think things will change when I get to a place where I can split up the work I'm doing.
I think the lack of a "scoped module interface" is a big problem. We cannot develop good package into Squeak without a NameSpace facility! What about this thing? Bye
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 10:18 am, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
I think the lack of a "scoped module interface" is a big problem. We cannot develop good package into Squeak without a NameSpace facility! What about this thing?
It's in 3.3alpha; have you looked at it?
Ned Konz wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 10:18 am, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
I think the lack of a "scoped module interface" is a big problem. We cannot develop good package into Squeak without a NameSpace facility! What about this thing?
It's in 3.3alpha; have you looked at it?
Not yet. What classes must I look for? There is some docs on the Squeak Swiki?
On Thursday 13 June 2002 05:13 am, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
Ned Konz wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 10:18 am, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
I think the lack of a "scoped module interface" is a big problem. We cannot develop good package into Squeak without a NameSpace facility! What about this thing?
It's in 3.3alpha; have you looked at it?
Not yet. What classes must I look for?
Look at Module and DeltaModule.
There is some docs on the Squeak Swiki?
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/Modules
Ned Konz wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 10:18 am, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
I think the lack of a "scoped module interface" is a big problem. We cannot develop good package into Squeak without a NameSpace facility! What about this thing?
It's in 3.3alpha; have you looked at it?
Yes, but iI cannot start the image with a 3.0 VM Where can I find a precompiled-windows VM that works ?! Thank you!
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 05:22:30PM +0200, Giovanni Giorgi wrote:
It's in 3.3alpha; have you looked at it?
Yes, but iI cannot start the image with a 3.0 VM Where can I find a precompiled-windows VM that works ?! Thank you!
ftp://st.cs.uiuc.edu/pub/Smalltalk/Squeak/3.2gamma/win/Squeak-Win32-3.2.2-VM.zip
Marcus
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Craig Latta -
Giovanni Giorgi -
Marcus Denker -
Ned Konz