I added some philosophy to them, since they seemed very laconic, and what was there was very technical.
Feel free to add what's still missing, argue about what's there...
Andreas was right that for people to benefit from an explicit, open process, the rationales have to be documented...
at http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3155
Another point to consider is that I'm not quite sure if non-harvesters will notice that it would do them good to read this, too. Maybe an added pointer in the right place would solve this? or maybe some of more general ideas should be on the new how to contribute to Squeak page (http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3279)?
Ideas welcome.
Daniel
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org