Cees, Doug, Tim, and all,
Gentlemen, how do you wish to proceed on this?
Thanks,
-- Scott
At 9:50 AM -0800 12/24/02, Tim Rowledge wrote:
In message <p05100303ba2925931ccd@[10.0.1.7]> Scott Wallace scott.wallace@squeakland.org wrote:
I presume that the appropriate fix at this point is to publish the TimeStamp class, which is currently in the SqueakMap code, to the 3.4b update stream. Any objections?
Weel we could use the alternative approach and remove the dependency on said class; what effect would that have on the usefulness of the uuid value?
tim