hi anthony
SmaCC-Development will be on squeakmac so everybody will be able to change it.
Stef
On Dimanche, nov 23, 2003, at 19:32 Europe/Zurich, Anthony Hannan wrote:
I hope your planning on including SmaCC-Development and not just SmaCC-Runtime. It wouldn't be Squeak if we could not change the Parser within itself.
Cheers, Tony
Doug Way dway@riskmetrics.com wrote:
On Thursday, November 20, 2003, at 02:21 AM, goran.krampe@bluefish.se wrote:
Doug Way dway@riskmetrics.com wrote:
There seems to be agreement that allowing the MIT license into "Squeak Official" (Full/Basic) is reasonable. (And also possibly BSD, but we might as well put that off until it is needed.
[SNIP of stuff I totally agree on]
Yes, all sounds good.
Alright, I'll incorporate SmaCC-Runtime in the next round of updates then. It will be handled as an "in-image" package for now, so we can keep track of the MIT-licensed code... the master copy of SmaCC will be on SqueakMap, and I'll just include the package as an update.
Hm, I notice the SmaCC Runtime package on SqueakMap says "Other License" at the moment, that should be changed to "MIT". Markus G., could you update this? Hm, also the package itself is a SAR at the moment (containing only one .st file)... it would be better if it were a .st or .cs file instead, so I don't have to keep converting from .sar by hand every time I incorporate a new version as a changeset update. (Not that that will probably happen very often, but...)
- Doug
Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation