Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus wrote:
One thing about "I am" comments in Smalltalk is that they are uniformly applied. "I am" never means the comment itself; it always refers either to the class the comment belongs to, or to a particular instance of that class. Once this is understood, the meaning is unambiguous.
No, it's not. It's still ambiguous as to whether it refers to the class or an instance of the class. It can be mildly irritating to waste a few extra moments deciding which of these is the case.
-Jesse