Hi Ned and all!
Ned Konz ned@bike-nomad.com wrote:
On Sunday 13 July 2003 07:46 am, goran.krampe@bluefish.se wrote:
Back from fishing.
Hope your mosquito bites aren't too bad!
Well, not too bad. Actually, the mosquitos aren't the worst. In the evening the so called "knott" (gnat) - they are similar to sandflies - makes it quite unbearable. But we had a slight breeze which is perfect, then they aren't around.
Got 50 perch over three evenings - perfect to "smoke" and then have on the special Norrland thin bread.
Anyway, it was great.
Just note that it really isn't as simple as just creating the directory. The reason SM doesn't check for the existence of the directory is that it SHOULD be there. If it isn't there then we have an SMSqueakMap instance but no corresponding log file - not a proper situation. They should always exist together and in synch.
What happens to me is that I'll copy an image into a new directory, or put a new image into a directory that has an old sm/ directory in it.
I think what happens is that the logic about loading full vs. updating needs to be looked at, based on the existence and contents of the sm directory.
Exactly, I have fixed this now and some more. Just published it - both SqueakMap Base 1.06 and SqueakMap 1.07. Tested installation in a 5331 image (updated from 5259 first), seems to work fine.
Please test as much as possible and post bug reports. I will scan for them the next few days. I did just realize that the sequence number introduced in the installedPackages Dictionary obviously makes less sense when a package is reinstalled... Ah well.
Gotta go.
regards, Göran