Tim --
The "Commenting Bugs and Fixes" page is up-to-date ( and fairly clear thanks to Joshua Gargus ): http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3103
-----Original Message----- From: Tim Rowledge [mailto:tim@sumeru.stanford.edu] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:11 PM To: squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re: Possibleextra text for Welcome
I've just been trying to review the process for harvesting and reveiwing fixes. It all seems a bit confused right now. There's the sqfixes page(s)on http://209.143.91.36/super/415 and various pages pointed to from there but much is out of date. For a start I can hardly bundle up stuff I've reviewed and email it to SqC anymore can I?
Perhaps I've missed stuff whilst I had my head down trying to update the VMMaker codebase? Given some fix or enh or whatever that I've reveiwed and would like to promote, what is the current best process?
tim
"Brent Vukmer" bvukmer@blackboard.com wrote:
Tim --
The "Commenting Bugs and Fixes" page is up-to-date ( and fairly clear thanks to Joshua Gargus ): http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3103
It is indeed reasonably clear for the purpose of submitting bugs, fixes etc but it doesn't help me much with my work as a harvester and guide. I know I can simply post an approving comment with the [et] etc tags but at some point there has to be a place where more happens.
What is the status of a better set of tools for all this?
tim
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org