RE: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re:Possibleextra text for Welcome
The qualifier may make that comment sound snarky -- sorry, Joshua.
s/fairly clear/*clear*
-----Original Message----- From: Brent Vukmer Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:22 PM To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation Subject: RE: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re:Possibleextra text for Welcome
Tim --
The "Commenting Bugs and Fixes" page is up-to-date ( and fairly clear thanks to Joshua Gargus ): http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3103
-----Original Message----- From: Tim Rowledge [mailto:tim@sumeru.stanford.edu] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:11 PM To: squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re: Possibleextra text for Welcome
I've just been trying to review the process for harvesting and reveiwing fixes. It all seems a bit confused right now. There's the sqfixes page(s)on http://209.143.91.36/super/415 and various pages pointed to from there but much is out of date. For a start I can hardly bundle up stuff I've reviewed and email it to SqC anymore can I?
Perhaps I've missed stuff whilst I had my head down trying to update the VMMaker codebase? Given some fix or enh or whatever that I've reveiwed and would like to promote, what is the current best process?
tim
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 03:31:28PM -0500, Brent Vukmer wrote:
The qualifier may make that comment sound snarky -- sorry, Joshua.
"Fairly clear" is fine; it's not the best writing I've ever churned out.
Besides, I didn't even notice until I saw your apology. Then I had to read farther to figure out what you were apologizing for :-)
Joshua
s/fairly clear/*clear*
-----Original Message----- From: Brent Vukmer Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:22 PM To: Discussing the Squeak Foundation Subject: RE: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re:Possibleextra text for Welcome
Tim --
The "Commenting Bugs and Fixes" page is up-to-date ( and fairly clear thanks to Joshua Gargus ): http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3103
-----Original Message----- From: Tim Rowledge [mailto:tim@sumeru.stanford.edu] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 3:11 PM To: squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org Subject: Re: [Squeakfoundation]Handling fixes/enhancements (was Re: Possibleextra text for Welcome
I've just been trying to review the process for harvesting and reveiwing fixes. It all seems a bit confused right now. There's the sqfixes page(s)on http://209.143.91.36/super/415 and various pages pointed to from there but much is out of date. For a start I can hardly bundle up stuff I've reviewed and email it to SqC anymore can I?
Perhaps I've missed stuff whilst I had my head down trying to update the VMMaker codebase? Given some fix or enh or whatever that I've reveiwed and would like to promote, what is the current best process?
tim
Tim Rowledge, tim@sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim Don't sweat petty things....or pet sweaty things. _______________________________________________ Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation _______________________________________________ Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation _______________________________________________ Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Brent Vukmer -
Joshua 'Schwa' Gargus