Did you read my first reply on this thread? I do agree that any work wholly seen by two different people should be considered "reviewed".
BTW, I agree with Goran and Avi that probably the best way to get a more parallel process is for people to homestead pieces of the image. What do you think it would take to make that work?
Daniel
Marcus Denker marcus@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:47:31PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
That won't work, because we can only look at a tiny portion of the posts. Effectively, this means that everyone has commit access. No open project that I know of works like this.
I don't think that we should allow anyone to do everything.
It would be nice to relax the harvesting-requirements on "trusted" people. e.g. if Ned or Anreas do some Morphic changes, there is really no way we can really review them. (I can't).
Marcus-- Marcus Denker marcus@ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 03:03:34PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
Did you read my first reply on this thread? I do agree that any work wholly seen by two different people should be considered "reviewed".
BTW, I agree with Goran and Avi that probably the best way to get a more parallel process is for people to homestead pieces of the image. What do you think it would take to make that work?
Ok, yes, I think we should try that.
The problem we have now with managing packages "outside" is that even if the packages get maintained on SM, they need to go throug the update stream if they should appear in the image...
We need to have a system that allows maintainers to update packages completely independed wrt the update-stream, but nevertheless be as good as the update-stream in the sense that changes get installed automatically.
Marcus
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Daniel Vainsencher -
Marcus Denker