Did you read my first reply on this thread? I do agree that any work wholly seen by two different people should be considered "reviewed".
BTW, I agree with Goran and Avi that probably the best way to get a more parallel process is for people to homestead pieces of the image. What do you think it would take to make that work?
Daniel
Marcus Denker marcus@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:47:31PM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
That won't work, because we can only look at a tiny portion of the posts. Effectively, this means that everyone has commit access. No open project that I know of works like this.
I don't think that we should allow anyone to do everything.
It would be nice to relax the harvesting-requirements on "trusted" people. e.g. if Ned or Anreas do some Morphic changes, there is really no way we can really review them. (I can't).
Marcus
-- Marcus Denker marcus@ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
Squeakfoundation mailing list Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation