For the past several days I've noticed that the processor usage for SqueakMap has been a little high, 2-5 times the average for a Squeak process on the system, but it has been working so I just continued to watch. However today it was much higher and non-responsive. So I killed it and let svc start it up again. It took longer than I'm accustomed to to become responsive again (10-20 seconds) but appears to be OK now.
The most recent map is dated the 15th and appears to be of expected size.
Ken
On 07/20/2010 06:33 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
For the past several days I've noticed that the processor usage for SqueakMap has been a little high, 2-5 times the average for a Squeak process on the system, but it has been working so I just continued to watch. However today it was much higher and non-responsive. So I killed it and let svc start it up again. It took longer than I'm accustomed to to become responsive again (10-20 seconds) but appears to be OK now.
The most recent map is dated the 15th and appears to be of expected size.
Ken
Ok, cool. Thanks!
Alltogether I think SM has been fairly stable over the years we have had it. Now, it is of course time to move to something new.
I might be able to find some serious time in about 2-3 months. We are getting a sister for Maya (hurray!) - Ji Huanman is her name, and we expect to go to China sometime in october to fetch her. Then, when we get home, I will probably be home with her and then I will have some time I expect.
regards, Göran
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org