(Moved to box-admins).
Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great. But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything back up and running.
Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com wrote:
It appears squeak.org and other sites (i.e. archive page for Squeak-dev) are hung/down. I intended to reboot the server with "shutdown -r now" in a little less than an hour. I'm leaving a window so that if somebody has a more appropriate procedure, then they can take over. It's 10:12am here and I intend to reboot at 11am. That's my plan. If that sounds like a bad idea, let me know before then.
Chris
All systems back up.
On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
(Moved to box-admins).
Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great. But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything back up and running.
Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to try it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to know."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk
Chris
Heh, ok. If none of the systems are responsive anyway seems like a reboot couldn't hurt. Thanks for taking care of it.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com wrote:
All systems back up.
On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
(Moved to box-admins).
Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great. But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything back up and running.
Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to try it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to know."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk
Chris
On 12/28/2012 10:16 AM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
All systems back up.
On 2012-12-28 10:53 AM, Chris Muller wrote:
(Moved to box-admins).
Are you sure that's the right action to take? If you are, then great. But Ken is usually very responsive, we should give him a bit more than an hour unless you are 100% certain rebooting will get everything back up and running.
Right now it looks like user 'website' is active (~30% cpu). It and 'wiki' both consuming 1GB RAM, that seems high..
No. I couldn't be sure. But I had never done it before, so I wanted to try it. It worked. Curiosity propels me in these situations. "I gots to know."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7YKbxmrFbk
Chris
Thanks. I would have appreciated the opportunity to take a look first, but I wasn't available, so be it.
Ken
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Chris Cunnington -
Chris Muller -
Ken Causey