Box Admins,
Can you do anything about blocking these emails?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: karl karl.ramberg@chello.se Date: Oct 25, 2005 11:44 AM Subject: Re: 情報漏洩です To: website@discuss.squeakfoundation.org
info@sdfrt.com wrote:
いろんな女の子の電話番号と住所書き込んじゃったー。 タダで見放題だー!!!みんなで電話しちゃってくれー。 http://www.00-love5.com/?hito
I don't veceive yourmail メール受信拒否 sweet_baby_sweet_12@yahoo.it
Can someone block this spam thing on the list ?
Karl
-- Jason Rogers
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." Galatians 2:20
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:46 -0400, Jason Rogers wrote:
Box Admins,
Can you do anything about blocking these emails?
I'll be interested to hear what others on this list have to say if anything but in my opinion, no.
First of all I consider spam fighting to be the task of the first and last hop. Mailing list servers like this are in the middle.
Primarily though I've done the job of administering spam blocking in the past and it was a nearly full time job to keep up with it (of course I was managing thousands of email addresses over dozens of domains and attempting something close to 95% or better accuracy at the time) and I just don't think we can afford the time.
Ken
On 10/25/05, Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com wrote:
First of all I consider spam fighting to be the task of the first and last hop. Mailing list servers like this are in the middle.
+1
Most lists are subscriber-only, and that's all the spam protection we'll likely offer. For the rest, rely on your local spamfilter...
On 10/25/05, Cees De Groot cdegroot@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/05, Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com wrote:
First of all I consider spam fighting to be the task of the first and last hop. Mailing list servers like this are in the middle.
+1
Most lists are subscriber-only, and that's all the spam protection we'll likely offer. For the rest, rely on your local spamfilter...
That's fair. Thank you for your input. So, can we get website@... to be a monitored list (akin to Yahoo! groups)? I will volunteer to monitor, reject, and allow posts if need be. I could easily see that as being part of my "job".
-- Jason Rogers
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." Galatians 2:20
How about this: it's currently planned to convert all lists from ezmlm lists (which is what your list is currently) to mailman lists. A mailman list is much more easily and flexibly configured. This is on the todo list but is kind of low priority. It doesn't take that long but requires a little coordination. What do you say to my setting you up with a new mailman hosted list today and you get it configured and have everyone move over to it?
Ken
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:40 -0400, Jason Rogers wrote:
On 10/25/05, Cees De Groot cdegroot@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/05, Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com wrote:
First of all I consider spam fighting to be the task of the first and last hop. Mailing list servers like this are in the middle.
+1
Most lists are subscriber-only, and that's all the spam protection we'll likely offer. For the rest, rely on your local spamfilter...
That's fair. Thank you for your input. So, can we get website@... to be a monitored list (akin to Yahoo! groups)? I will volunteer to monitor, reject, and allow posts if need be. I could easily see that as being part of my "job".
-- Jason Rogers
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." Galatians 2:20
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org