As I think I have previously mentioned (maybe on the dev list), the Universes dependency is merely to support an icon for the Universe browser and is safe to "proceed" when loading.
As for Seaside, as Simon said, the UI Enhancements should have no impact on Seaside functionality.
Gary
-----Original Message----- From: ui-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:ui-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Adrian Lienhard Sent: 17 February 2008 10:39 PM To: Squeak's User Interface Subject: Re: [UI] Seaside and UI Enhancements??
I tested UIEnhancements with a stock 3.9 image. Unfortunately, the package depends on Package Universes, which depends on YAXO. So its not straightforward to load, but its doable if you know how. It would be nice to have just one Monticello package without dependencies...
Cheers, Adrian
On Feb 17, 2008, at 21:00 , Simon Kirk wrote:
Bill Schwab wrote:
Are any of you using Seaside with Gary's UI Enhancements? It seems like it should be ok, but if there are any tricks to getting everything installed, time-saving pointers would be appreciated. I am giving an introductory presentation on Smalltalk and Seaside (very basic stuff), and prefer to have the improved GUI if at all possible.
Hi Bill.
Here at Pinesoft (where Gary works!) we're developing with Seaside in dev images (as in, Damien Cassou's dev images) with the UI enhancements enabled. I'm not sure what you mean by "with", do you just mean an image with the UI enhancements making it look pretty?
If that's the case I'm not sure what issues there are, as afaicr Seaside and the UI enhancements are orthogonal.
Cheers, Simon -- View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Seaside-and-UI-Enhancements---tp15529989p155
32405.html
Sent from the Squeak - UI mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
UI mailing list UI@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
_______________________________________________ UI mailing list UI@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui