On 14.01.2014, at 14:02, Tobias Pape Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
On 14.01.2014, at 13:50, David T. Lewis lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:25:14AM +0100, Tobias Pape wrote:
On 14.01.2014, at 11:21, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, I thought Tobias meant "run source.squeak.org's image with SS3 code" rather than "move source.squeak.org's code to the SS3 servers".
Which would address your concerns about external/internal projects, and the need to self-host.
Yes.
That was my understanding of the conversation as well.
So you argue that patching ssc (squeaksource.com) to support newer Squeak and Seaside *again* is easier or more sustainable than migrating to the sqeaksource3 codebase?
OH forget that mail! I confused Chris and Dave. I am so stupid today :( Sorry
Best -Tobiad