On 2012-10-29 11:45 AM, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:37:45AM -0400, Chris Cunnington wrote:
I'm not sure what happened but the response time for http://www.squeakci.org looks quite acceptable. I don't know why that is, exactly. Perhaps David did something over the weekend. Or the efforts we put into place last week have cleared up the situation. The logs files are rolling over to newer ones. The log files are not stuffed with requests trying to use us as an open proxy. The situation certainly looks healthier now.
I did not do anything that would affect overall performance, although I did set the squeak VM build job to run at low priority to avoid impacting the interactive web server. I also have a moderately effective watchdog process (running in the Squeak image) that kills the VM if it gets stuck part way through a VM build. Hopefully that will prevent runaway images in the future, but I'll need to keep an eye on it for a while.
As of this morning the InterpreterVM job seems to be working fairly well. Check out http://box3.squeak.org/job/InterpreterVM/
Dave
Nice. You certainly got the hang of it quickly. I didn't know the subdomain was live. Cool stuff.
Chris