Hi folks,
could the Squeakland developers use a squeak.org server for their update stream?
This used to be hosted on a Viewpoints server. But since VPRI is not directly supporting Etoys/Squeakland anymore, we need an alternative. Hosting on a squeak.org server to me seems to be a good idea in the long run.
Technically this is a simple WebDAV server. World-readable, writable by a handful of committers - initially perhaps Milan Zimmerman, Karl Ramberg, Hilaire Fernandes, Korakurider, Yoshiki, me.
We may also need a subversion repo for images, installers etc. But right now we're only blocking on the missing update stream.
How does that sound? If it sounds good, who could make it happen?
- Bert -
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:06 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Hi folks,
could the Squeakland developers use a squeak.org server for their update stream?
This used to be hosted on a Viewpoints server. But since VPRI is not directly supporting Etoys/Squeakland anymore, we need an alternative. Hosting on a squeak.org server to me seems to be a good idea in the long run.
Technically this is a simple WebDAV server. World-readable, writable by a handful of committers - initially perhaps Milan Zimmerman, Karl Ramberg, Hilaire Fernandes, Korakurider, Yoshiki, me.
We may also need a subversion repo for images, installers etc. But right now we're only blocking on the missing update stream.
How does that sound? If it sounds good, who could make it happen?
- Bert -
"Who could make it happen?" You! ;)
I believe we have web-dav support for apache2 installed and was even in use at one point.
What are the space requirements? Unless its more than 5GB it's not likely to be a problem.
As long as you are willing to 'maintain' it I'm happy to have it and help get it set up.
Ken
Hi!
Ken Causey wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:06 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Hi folks,
could the Squeakland developers use a squeak.org server for their update stream?
This used to be hosted on a Viewpoints server. But since VPRI is not directly supporting Etoys/Squeakland anymore, we need an alternative. Hosting on a squeak.org server to me seems to be a good idea in the long run.
Technically this is a simple WebDAV server. World-readable, writable by a handful of committers - initially perhaps Milan Zimmerman, Karl Ramberg, Hilaire Fernandes, Korakurider, Yoshiki, me.
We may also need a subversion repo for images, installers etc. But right now we're only blocking on the missing update stream.
How does that sound? If it sounds good, who could make it happen?
- Bert -
"Who could make it happen?" You! ;)
I believe we have web-dav support for apache2 installed and was even in use at one point.
What are the space requirements? Unless its more than 5GB it's not likely to be a problem.
As long as you are willing to 'maintain' it I'm happy to have it and help get it set up.
Yeah, sure!
regards, Go"ran
On 15.02.2010, at 23:09, Ken Causey wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:06 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Hi folks,
could the Squeakland developers use a squeak.org server for their update stream?
This used to be hosted on a Viewpoints server. But since VPRI is not directly supporting Etoys/Squeakland anymore, we need an alternative. Hosting on a squeak.org server to me seems to be a good idea in the long run.
Technically this is a simple WebDAV server. World-readable, writable by a handful of committers - initially perhaps Milan Zimmerman, Karl Ramberg, Hilaire Fernandes, Korakurider, Yoshiki, me.
We may also need a subversion repo for images, installers etc. But right now we're only blocking on the missing update stream.
How does that sound? If it sounds good, who could make it happen?
- Bert -
"Who could make it happen?" You! ;)
I believe we have web-dav support for apache2 installed and was even in use at one point.
What are the space requirements? Unless its more than 5GB it's not likely to be a problem.
As long as you are willing to 'maintain' it I'm happy to have it and help get it set up.
Ken
After some discussion on etoys-dev we decided that a better way forward is using Monticello so I now created
http://source.squeak.org/etoys.html
Hope that's okay with everyone?
- Bert -
On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 21:42 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
After some discussion on etoys-dev we decided that a better way forward is using Monticello so I now created
http://source.squeak.org/etoys.html
Hope that's okay with everyone?
- Bert -
Sure.
Ken
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Bert Freudenberg -
Göran Krampe -
Ken Causey