I went into box2 and killed the old homepage image. You can see the line that was the process here [1]. This also involved deleting the symlink as well. [2] The service directory in /home/website is now gone as well.
The wildcard DNS routes unknown subdomain requests to some daemontools service for looking at old mailing lists. I don't think it's a process. It's some kind of cgi-bin thing. Check it out:
Deleting symlinks and service directories is a tad barbaric. I'm getting under svc -d /service/fooservice and such to stop services instead. But this is a sunset box. By St. Patrick's Day next year, it will be gone.
Chris
[1]
website 577 24.9 10.2 1051420 99212 ? S Mar16 44:39 /usr/bin/squeakvm -vm-display=none /home/website/website/squeaksite.image
[2]
/service lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Sep 27 2008 www.squeak.org -> /home/website/servicenew
May we please retain the old site a while longer (at some different url or even IP is fine)? I would like to actually finally _read_ it all the way, but it disappeared before I had a chance.
Thanks.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Chris Cunnington websela@yahoo.com wrote:
I went into box2 and killed the old homepage image. You can see the line that was the process here [1]. This also involved deleting the symlink as well. [2] The service directory in /home/website is now gone as well.
The wildcard DNS routes unknown subdomain requests to some daemontools service for looking at old mailing lists. I don't think it's a process. It's some kind of cgi-bin thing. Check it out:
Deleting symlinks and service directories is a tad barbaric. I'm getting under svc -d /service/fooservice and such to stop services instead. But this is a sunset box. By St. Patrick's Day next year, it will be gone.
Chris
[1]
website 577 24.9 10.2 1051420 99212 ? S Mar16 44:39 /usr/bin/squeakvm -vm-display=none /home/website/website/squeaksite.image
[2]
/service lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Sep 27 2008 www.squeak.org -> /home/website/servicenew
On Mar 16, 2014, at 11:24 PM, Chris Muller asqueaker@gmail.com wrote:
May we please retain the old site a while longer (at some different url or even IP is fine)? I would like to actually finally _read_ it all the way, but it disappeared before I had a chance.
Thanks.
Read it on your computer in localhost [1].
I don't think there's any really need to be sentimental about the old site. I killed the process to use the cycles for productive processes. But, hey, the Board meeting's tomorrow and you can table something.
Chris
[1]
May we please retain the old site a while longer (at some different url or even IP is fine)? I would like to actually finally _read_ it all the way, but it disappeared before I had a chance.
Thanks.
Read it on your computer in localhost [1].
I don't think there's any really need to be sentimental about the old site. I killed the process to use the cycles for productive processes.
Hey Chris, I know everyone appreciates the work you did on the new site and I'm glad you had free-reign to make it good without a lot of overhead. Going forward, could you possibly take a more conservative tact esp. w.r.t. moving, killing and deleting long-running stuff? Maybe a little notice to the community, or at least leaving yourself in a position to reverse your actions in case there might be a community need for some file before you unilaterally zap it into oblivion?
Look to how Ken would have handled such a thing, or how David Lewis handled the transition of squeaksource.com, or how I tried to handle the 4.5 release -- by being slow, methodical, and involving the community.
Thanks.
But, hey, the Board meeting's tomorrow and you can table something.
On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Chris Muller ma.chris.m@gmail.com wrote:
May we please retain the old site a while longer (at some different url or even IP is fine)? I would like to actually finally _read_ it all the way, but it disappeared before I had a chance.
Thanks.
Read it on your computer in localhost [1].
I don't think there's any really need to be sentimental about the old site. I killed the process to use the cycles for productive processes.
Hey Chris, I know everyone appreciates the work you did on the new site and I'm glad you had free-reign to make it good without a lot of overhead. Going forward, could you possibly take a more conservative tact esp. w.r.t. moving, killing and deleting long-running stuff? Maybe a little notice to the community, or at least leaving yourself in a position to reverse your actions in case there might be a community need for some file before you unilaterally zap it into oblivion?
Look to how Ken would have handled such a thing, or how David Lewis handled the transition of squeaksource.com, or how I tried to handle the 4.5 release -- by being slow, methodical, and involving the community.
Thanks.
But, hey, the Board meeting's tomorrow and you can table something.
Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
I think you're right. I'll do that.
Chris
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Chris Cunnington -
Chris Muller -
Chris Muller