What do you think of this? My understanding was that space was at a premium, and so we probably won't want to do this. Any thoughts?
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: stéphane ducasse ducasse@iam.unibe.ch Date: Oct 5, 2005 3:44 PM Subject: may be you could include my videos To: website@discuss.squeakfoundation.org
Hi
feel free to take my squeak videos and put them on the website. I will continue to produce new ones.
Stef
-- Jason Rogers
"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me." Galatians 2:20
Space isn't at a premium (we have 160GB), but bandwidth is (ok, not really, we're currently using around 20-30% of our allocated traffic, but no reasons to be wasteful)... I suggest that anything over, say, 50Mb is put on-line as bittorrents...
On 10/6/05, Jason Rogers jacaetevha@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think of this? My understanding was that space was at a premium, and so we probably won't want to do this. Any thoughts?
I haven't had the time yet to come up with a way to make it more generally available but I do have a bittorrent tracker/seeder setup on box2 under my personal account and I would be happy to add files to it. So send me URLs to anything you would like to make available via bittorrent.
Ken
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 10:07 +0200, Cees De Groot wrote:
Space isn't at a premium (we have 160GB), but bandwidth is (ok, not really, we're currently using around 20-30% of our allocated traffic, but no reasons to be wasteful)... I suggest that anything over, say, 50Mb is put on-line as bittorrents...
On 10/6/05, Jason Rogers jacaetevha@gmail.com wrote:
What do you think of this? My understanding was that space was at a premium, and so we probably won't want to do this. Any thoughts?
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org