I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
Anyone have a take on this?
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 merlyn@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
Jason Rogers wrote:
Anyone have a take on this?
I don't have time at the moment. 3.10 seems to be ready soon, too. Bundles with all files must be made for Mac and Win at least. Anybody ?
Karl
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
-- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 merlyn@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training! _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
That's not how it is supposed to work. The team picks a new leader. Or if there is no one within the team then the community at-large picks a new team leader by discussion on squeak-dev.
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 16:27 +0100, karl wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
Another note, I've been Webteam 'leader' quite a few years now and would like to step down. Could the new board pick a new one, and possibly revigorate the web appearance of Squeak.
Karl _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
I agree but I have announced the position available several times over the years and nothing has happened. So I ask a board member to raise the issue to see if a solution could be found.
Karl
Ken Causey wrote:
That's not how it is supposed to work. The team picks a new leader. Or if there is no one within the team then the community at-large picks a new team leader by discussion on squeak-dev.
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 16:27 +0100, karl wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
Another note, I've been Webteam 'leader' quite a few years now and would like to step down. Could the new board pick a new one, and possibly revigorate the web appearance of Squeak.
Karl _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
OK, well I guess I had forgotten that but please raise the issue once more within the team and on Squeak-dev and this time give a specific date that you will be stepping down.
I firmly believe that the Board must not take action unless no one else can or will. So yes in the end the Board may have to intervene, but before that the community should be made well aware of the issue and have an opportunity to take care of it as a community. Not only is that better for the community as a whole but it is also better for the Board in that if in the end it takes it upon itself to search for a replacement then the community can't complain that it was somehow left out of the process.
Of course that does not mean that after you post to squeak-dev that one or more Board members as individuals can't step forward and stress the importance of the work of the website team and the need for it's continuance, but they should do so as individuals, albeit as individuals with a bit more influence than the average.
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 21:22 +0100, karl wrote:
I agree but I have announced the position available several times over the years and nothing has happened. So I ask a board member to raise the issue to see if a solution could be found.
Karl
Ken Causey wrote:
That's not how it is supposed to work. The team picks a new leader. Or if there is no one within the team then the community at-large picks a new team leader by discussion on squeak-dev.
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 16:27 +0100, karl wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
Another note, I've been Webteam 'leader' quite a few years now and would like to step down. Could the new board pick a new one, and possibly revigorate the web appearance of Squeak.
Karl _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
Ken Causey wrote:
OK, well I guess I had forgotten that but please raise the issue once more within the team and on Squeak-dev and this time give a specific date that you will be stepping down.
I firmly believe that the Board must not take action unless no one else can or will. So yes in the end the Board may have to intervene, but before that the community should be made well aware of the issue and have an opportunity to take care of it as a community. Not only is that better for the community as a whole but it is also better for the Board in that if in the end it takes it upon itself to search for a replacement then the community can't complain that it was somehow left out of the process.
Of course that does not mean that after you post to squeak-dev that one or more Board members as individuals can't step forward and stress the importance of the work of the website team and the need for it's continuance, but they should do so as individuals, albeit as individuals with a bit more influence than the average.
Ok, I'll make and announcement on Squeak-dev and the webteam list. Karl
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 21:22 +0100, karl wrote:
I agree but I have announced the position available several times over the years and nothing has happened. So I ask a board member to raise the issue to see if a solution could be found.
Karl
Ken Causey wrote:
That's not how it is supposed to work. The team picks a new leader. Or if there is no one within the team then the community at-large picks a new team leader by discussion on squeak-dev.
Ken
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 16:27 +0100, karl wrote:
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I thought 3.9.1 was preferred now.
Another note, I've been Webteam 'leader' quite a few years now and would like to step down. Could the new board pick a new one, and possibly revigorate the web appearance of Squeak.
Karl _______________________________________________ Webteam mailing list Webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
webteam@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Jason Rogers -
karl -
Ken Causey -
merlyn＠stonehenge.com