On 2013-01-09 1:49 PM, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 9 January 2013 18:40, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 09.01.2013, at 10:37, Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com wrote:
Frankly I really don't like the idea of the community servers being used to host services under domains which the box-admins team does not have full access to modify. I know from experience that the services we as a community have to maintain often survive beyond the interest of the creator of said service. But I know you spent some money to get that domain name and it has a rather specific purpose. I would appreciate it though if you would suggest an alternative squeak.org hostname, perhaps ci.squeak.org or jenkins.squeak.org which can be used as an alternative (alongside squeakci.org) and perhaps even the primary access method by users.
+1
All our primary host names should be in the squeak.org domain.
- Bert -
Agreed... but let's not forget that squeakci.org was (from what I understand) a spike - Chris saw the need for CI, so did the quickest/simplest thing possible.
frank
Yea. I mean this is a "pioneers giving way to settlers" thing. Some action needed to be taken and I took it. But it's not my thing now. I'm happy it exists, fills a need in the community, and we can transition so that the Box team has full control.
Chris