I don't care for the look of this:
$ ls -l /home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 206639644 Nov 4 19:04 /home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image
and from recent backups:
$ ls -l /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.*/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 2 squeaksource squeaksource 126410176 Nov 3 20:53 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.0/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 2 squeaksource squeaksource 126410176 Nov 3 20:53 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.1/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 107722376 Nov 3 01:45 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.2/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 81522832 Nov 2 02:20 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.3/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 36027872 Oct 31 15:11 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.4/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 36022052 Oct 30 15:09 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.5/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image -rw-r--r-- 1 squeaksource squeaksource 36016332 Oct 29 15:06 /var/cache/rsnapshot/daily.6/localhost/home/squeaksource/Squeak3.11-8824-SS.image
Does anyone with some Squeaksource expertise care to take a look at this?
I apologize for my rustiness on Squeaksource issues. What are we in danger of losing if we replace the image with one from say the 29th?
Ken