On 09.01.2013, at 10:37, Ken Causey ken@kencausey.com wrote:
Frankly I really don't like the idea of the community servers being used to host services under domains which the box-admins team does not have full access to modify. I know from experience that the services we as a community have to maintain often survive beyond the interest of the creator of said service. But I know you spent some money to get that domain name and it has a rather specific purpose. I would appreciate it though if you would suggest an alternative squeak.org hostname, perhaps ci.squeak.org or jenkins.squeak.org which can be used as an alternative (alongside squeakci.org) and perhaps even the primary access method by users.
+1
All our primary host names should be in the squeak.org domain.
- Bert -