On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days ago using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Well, the link only shows up on the Home page.
Regarding killing the image - what storage backend do you use?
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 22:08 , Ken Causey wrote:
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote:
> I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days > ago > using the address on the web site, and am still waiting.
You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member".
The admins can be reached at
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Probably the admin link at
source.squeakfoundation.org
should be changed to reflect that.
- Bert -
Eh, dunno. Doug set it up. I guess I will wait awhile to see if he responds before I do anything drastic.
Thanks,
Ken
P.S. The link does not show up for me on the Home page.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:14 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Well, the link only shows up on the Home page.
Regarding killing the image - what storage backend do you use?
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 22:08 , Ken Causey wrote:
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and restart it under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until Ralph is settled in.
I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please let me know and give me another option.
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote: > >> I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few days >> ago >> using the address on the web site, and am still waiting. > > You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member". > > The admins can be reached at > > box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org > > Probably the admin link at > > source.squeakfoundation.org > > should be changed to reflect that. > > - Bert -
Yes, the superuser flag was something that has to be set in the image. I'm still a superuser... at least it still allows me to add developers & admins to any project for example. I think the version of squeaksource running at source.squeakfoundation.org is fairly old, so that there is no "Edit Settings" that I can see.
For storage backend, it was just a directory of files, and I assume that's still the case? (Not sure if you've made any major changes to the squeaksource configuration, Ken...)
- Doug
On Feb 1, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
Eh, dunno. Doug set it up. I guess I will wait awhile to see if he responds before I do anything drastic.
Thanks,
Ken
P.S. The link does not show up for me on the Home page.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:14 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Well, the link only shows up on the Home page.
Regarding killing the image - what storage backend do you use?
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 22:08 , Ken Causey wrote:
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings".
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote:
> Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and > restart it > under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until > Ralph is > settled in. > > I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the > squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please > let me > know and give me another option. > > Ken > > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote: >> >>> I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few >>> days >>> ago >>> using the address on the web site, and am still waiting. >> >> You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member". >> >> The admins can be reached at >> >> box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org >> >> Probably the admin link at >> >> source.squeakfoundation.org >> >> should be changed to reflect that. >> >> - Bert -
The repository settings were introduced in December 05, after merging SqueakSource-bf.154 and SqueakSource-pmm.141. Not sure where you started off.
As for storage, either you periodically save the image, or you serialize the meta data. In any case, killing it can lead to data loss. OTOH, the only recent activity I see was the one by edgar, so if this is lost, it could easily be redone.
- Bert -
On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:07 , Doug Way wrote:
Yes, the superuser flag was something that has to be set in the image. I'm still a superuser... at least it still allows me to add developers & admins to any project for example. I think the version of squeaksource running at source.squeakfoundation.org is fairly old, so that there is no "Edit Settings" that I can see.
For storage backend, it was just a directory of files, and I assume that's still the case? (Not sure if you've made any major changes to the squeaksource configuration, Ken...)
- Doug
On Feb 1, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
Eh, dunno. Doug set it up. I guess I will wait awhile to see if he responds before I do anything drastic.
Thanks,
Ken
P.S. The link does not show up for me on the Home page.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:14 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Well, the link only shows up on the Home page.
Regarding killing the image - what storage backend do you use?
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 22:08 , Ken Causey wrote:
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even though I believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't remember the term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear in the left hand menu?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: > Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can > change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings". > > - Bert - > > On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote: > >> Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and >> restart it >> under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until >> Ralph is >> settled in. >> >> I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the >> squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please >> let me >> know and give me another option. >> >> Ken >> >> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote: >>> >>>> I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few >>>> days >>>> ago >>>> using the address on the web site, and am still waiting. >>> >>> You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member". >>> >>> The admins can be reached at >>> >>> box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>> >>> Probably the admin link at >>> >>> source.squeakfoundation.org >>> >>> should be changed to reflect that. >>> >>> - Bert -
Thanks for the information Bert. In any case it looks as though I don't really have a choice in the matter. I'll stop the image, restart it under vnc, change the admin address, confirm that I am marked as a superuser, and then I think I will leave it under vnc for the moment since maybe we should consider updating the version of SqueakSource. I really don't know anything about doing that. So I would be appreciative of any comments that you or Doug have about whether that is worth doing and how we should go about it.
..../me starts doing above...
OK. I've restarted SqueakSource under vnc. Doug has the password. If you would like to take a look Bert, let me know and I can send it to you.
I modified SSRespository class>>adminEmail changing the returned result to the box-admins list and that seems to have done the job.
Currently we have a slightly modified version of SqueakSource-dew.152 installed. The nearest non-dew ancester is bf-150, so it looks like we are a little behind when that feature was added.
Ken
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 11:41 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
The repository settings were introduced in December 05, after merging SqueakSource-bf.154 and SqueakSource-pmm.141. Not sure where you started off.
As for storage, either you periodically save the image, or you serialize the meta data. In any case, killing it can lead to data loss. OTOH, the only recent activity I see was the one by edgar, so if this is lost, it could easily be redone.
- Bert -
On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:07 , Doug Way wrote:
Yes, the superuser flag was something that has to be set in the image. I'm still a superuser... at least it still allows me to add developers & admins to any project for example. I think the version of squeaksource running at source.squeakfoundation.org is fairly old, so that there is no "Edit Settings" that I can see.
For storage backend, it was just a directory of files, and I assume that's still the case? (Not sure if you've made any major changes to the squeaksource configuration, Ken...)
- Doug
On Feb 1, 2007, at 4:34 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
Eh, dunno. Doug set it up. I guess I will wait awhile to see if he responds before I do anything drastic.
Thanks,
Ken
P.S. The link does not show up for me on the Home page.
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 22:14 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Well, the link only shows up on the Home page.
Regarding killing the image - what storage backend do you use?
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 22:08 , Ken Causey wrote:
I believe I set that flag for my self previously through Squeak. Maybe this feature doesn't exist in v1.1? Or maybe something happened to remove my superuser status. In any case I guess I'm back to restarting the image under vnc. Any comments on the safety of killing the image?
Ken
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 21:24 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Will only show up for super users. I'm actually not sure if you can set the superuser flag through the web UI ...
- Bert -
On Feb 1, 2007, at 21:03 , Ken Causey wrote:
> Ah thanks for the info. (/me is glad he asked). However, even > though I > believe I have myself setup as a highest level user (can't > remember > the > term at the moment), I don't see such a link. Should it appear > in the > left hand menu? > > Ken > > On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:50 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >> Not sure about the foundation server, but in our install you can >> change this simply by clicking "Edit Settings". >> >> - Bert - >> >> On Feb 1, 2007, at 20:32 , Ken Causey wrote: >> >>> Yes, probably so. However, I will have to shut it down and >>> restart it >>> under tightvnc to do that. I think I will at least wait until >>> Ralph is >>> settled in. >>> >>> I'm hoping that data loss is not likely if I simply kill the >>> squeaksource process. If anyone knows differently then please >>> let me >>> know and give me another option. >>> >>> Ken >>> >>> On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 17:00 +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote: >>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 15:33 , Ralph Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>>> I don't have an account yet. I asked for an account a few >>>>> days >>>>> ago >>>>> using the address on the web site, and am still waiting. >>>> >>>> You get an account just by clicking on "Register Member". >>>> >>>> The admins can be reached at >>>> >>>> box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org >>>> >>>> Probably the admin link at >>>> >>>> source.squeakfoundation.org >>>> >>>> should be changed to reflect that. >>>> >>>> - Bert -
On Feb 2, 2007, at 5:14 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
Thanks for the information Bert. In any case it looks as though I don't really have a choice in the matter. I'll stop the image, restart it under vnc, change the admin address, confirm that I am marked as a superuser, and then I think I will leave it under vnc for the moment since maybe we should consider updating the version of SqueakSource. I really don't know anything about doing that. So I would be appreciative of any comments that you or Doug have about whether that is worth doing and how we should go about it.
Well, as a starting point, there are the step-by-step instructions I left on the http://source.squeakfoundation.org SqueakSource-SqF project wiki tab (as you probably know). Perhaps Bert or someone knowledgeable with a more recent setup could comment on whether the steps would be roughly the same for setting up a new image with the latest & greatest, and which package versions would be needed, and whether it would 3.7 or 3.8 or 3.9.
I think that was set up sometime in 2005, so it is getting a bit old. Of course, I don't know if there are new features which are really desperately needed or not. Being able to set more admin settings through the UI would be nice. Does anyone know if the newer versions are generally more stable?
As far as whether the current setup saves its metadata in the image or serialized into files, I'm 95% sure that it's in files. (I haven't looked in a long time, and for all practical purposes, Ken is the current maintainer. :-) ) But I do remember seeing some type of metadata files being stored in a directory, and I noted that saving the image periodically seemed to be optional.
Would we be able to use the same metadata files (and directory structure etc) if we replaced the current squeaksource image with a new up-to-date one?
- Doug
On 03.02.2007, at 20:02, Doug Way wrote:
Well, as a starting point, there are the step-by-step instructions I left on the http://source.squeakfoundation.org SqueakSource-SqF project wiki tab (as you probably know). Perhaps Bert or someone knowledgeable with a more recent setup could comment on whether the steps would be roughly the same for setting up a new image with the latest & greatest, and which package versions would be needed, and whether it would 3.7 or 3.8 or 3.9.
I think that was set up sometime in 2005, so it is getting a bit old. Of course, I don't know if there are new features which are really desperately needed or not. Being able to set more admin settings through the UI would be nice. Does anyone know if the newer versions are generally more stable?
As far as whether the current setup saves its metadata in the image or serialized into files, I'm 95% sure that it's in files. (I haven't looked in a long time, and for all practical purposes, Ken is the current maintainer. :-) ) But I do remember seeing some type of metadata files being stored in a directory, and I noted that saving the image periodically seemed to be optional.
Would we be able to use the same metadata files (and directory structure etc) if we replaced the current squeaksource image with a new up-to-date one?
The best would be to coordinate this a bit with Andrian and Phillippe (who did some work on SqueakSource), they are keeping the squeaksource.com setup up to date.
I had this on the todo for some time in the fall to sit together with Adrian and install the latest version... but we never managed to actually find thet time.
I've CC:ed Adrian and Phillipe.
Marcus
Marcus Denker wrote:
On 03.02.2007, at 20:02, Doug Way wrote:
Well, as a starting point, there are the step-by-step instructions I left on the http://source.squeakfoundation.org SqueakSource-SqF project wiki tab (as you probably know). Perhaps Bert or someone knowledgeable with a more recent setup could comment on whether the steps would be roughly the same for setting up a new image with the latest & greatest, and which package versions would be needed, and whether it would 3.7 or 3.8 or 3.9.
Do not migrate to a version of Squeak with a different Chronology hierarchy. In general you would not want to migrate to a different Squeak version at all.
General show stoppers for updates are class shape changes (Monticello and Chronology).
A general update path is somewhat like this: - take a copy of your working image - load Monticello-avi.279 - load or merge SqueakSource-lr.1013 - see if it works (go to a project and display the details of a version) - if it works remove all the stuff that is specific to our implementation (incomment saving of metadata, change the google analytics account, enable SqueakMap realeases). Even better make them configurable.
I think that was set up sometime in 2005, so it is getting a bit old. Of course, I don't know if there are new features which are really desperately needed or not.
There are quite a bit of improvements in all areas (speed, features, fixes). Whether you need them desperately is a different question.
Being able to set more admin settings through the UI would be nice.
Do you have any examples?
Does anyone know if the newer versions are generally more stable?
Instabilities are caused by Squeak, not SqueakSource. So the answer is no. You can try to make Seaside use IdentityKeyDictionary instead of WeakIdentityKeyDictionary.
As far as whether the current setup saves its metadata in the image or serialized into files, I'm 95% sure that it's in files. (I haven't looked in a long time, and for all practical purposes, Ken is the current maintainer. :-) ) But I do remember seeing some type of metadata files being stored in a directory, and I noted that saving the image periodically seemed to be optional.
We do not store the metadata in a separate file anymore because that takes too much time (and the Mac VM doesn't support forking). We are unhappy with this solution but that's how it is for now. For small installations saving metadata should be no problem. You will have to incomment the respective methods. In the Impara repository there is a Magma back-end. This is definitely worth looking at.
Would we be able to use the same metadata files (and directory structure etc) if we replaced the current squeaksource image with a new up-to-date one?
Yes, as long as the shape of the repecitve classes (Monticello and Chronology) has not changed. I would really just update the code instead of setting up a new image.
The best would be to coordinate this a bit with Andrian and Phillippe (who did some work on SqueakSource), they are keeping the squeaksource.com setup up to date.
I had this on the todo for some time in the fall to sit together with Adrian and install the latest version... but we never managed to actually find thet time.
I've CC:ed Adrian and Phillipe.
Marcus
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 00:07 -0500, Doug Way wrote:
Yes, the superuser flag was something that has to be set in the image. I'm still a superuser... at least it still allows me to add developers & admins to any project for example. I think the version of squeaksource running at source.squeakfoundation.org is fairly old, so that there is no "Edit Settings" that I can see.
For storage backend, it was just a directory of files, and I assume that's still the case? (Not sure if you've made any major changes to the squeaksource configuration, Ken...)
- Doug
No not really. I set myself as superuser, and there was some problem we fixed (which is why I was in the image in the first place), but I have not changed anything of significance.
Ken
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Bert Freudenberg -
Doug Way -
Ken Causey -
Marcus Denker -
Philippe Marschall