Very curious. How could the board list work and not squeak-dev? I'll cc the box admins, maybe that list still works ...
- Bert -
On 25.01.2012, at 20:13, Chris Cunnington wrote:
OK. I concur.
I tried pinging Squeak-dev. It's down. The Squeak Board mailing list works. Mailman, I guess.
Chris
On 2012-01-25, at 10:14 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
Gents, I posted some packages into trunk today, but I don't see any messages on squeak-dev to that effect. We might be down again..?
If somehow some database specific to the squeak-dev list got munged in some fashion. I've been looking at it for a while now but haven't found anything yet. It would really help if someone could tell me about a message they sent recently that did not go through, specifically the time it was sent as accurately as possible, the From, and the Subject.
Ken
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Very curious. How could the board list work and not squeak-dev? I'll cc the box admins, maybe that list still works ...
- Bert -
On 25.01.2012, at 20:13, Chris Cunnington wrote:
OK. I concur.
I tried pinging Squeak-dev. It's down. The Squeak Board mailing list works. Mailman, I guess.
Chris
On 2012-01-25, at 10:14 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
Gents, I posted some packages into trunk today, but I don't see any messages on squeak-dev to that effect. We might be down again..?
I sent this last night:
"
From: Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com Subject: Ping for ping's sake Date: 25 January, 2012 11:06:50 PM EST To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Testing.
Please Ignore.
Chris "
Chris
On 12-01-26 5:11 PM, Ken Causey wrote:
If somehow some database specific to the squeak-dev list got munged in some fashion. I've been looking at it for a while now but haven't found anything yet. It would really help if someone could tell me about a message they sent recently that did not go through, specifically the time it was sent as accurately as possible, the From, and the Subject.
Ken
First let me apologize for not correcting this yet. I've looked around quite a bit and tried a number of mailman utilities to check the status of files and re-process queued messages and the like to no result. I've looked through log files and don't see anything useful yet. I'm not done but I've suddenly acquired a lot of work (was waiting on a government agency that suddenly came back to life and now is waiting on me) and my work on this is going to have to suffer. If someone else wants to look at this I welcome it. The mailman stuff is all configured under a user named 'list'. If you have root access you can 'su - list' and end up in the home directory where everything resides. There are logs under /var/log/mailman/ and general qmail logs in /var/log/mail.*, etc. If someone decides to take a look and wants to chat with me I'm on skype as 'kencausey'. I will keep working on this but as I said it's going to be slower than I would like and the list has already been down excruciatingly long (since early (GMT) on the 24th it appears).
Sorry,
Ken
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
Very curious. How could the board list work and not squeak-dev? I'll cc the box admins, maybe that list still works ...
- Bert -
On 25.01.2012, at 20:13, Chris Cunnington wrote:
OK. I concur.
I tried pinging Squeak-dev. It's down. The Squeak Board mailing list works. Mailman, I guess.
Chris
On 2012-01-25, at 10:14 PM, Chris Muller wrote:
Gents, I posted some packages into trunk today, but I don't see any messages on squeak-dev to that effect. We might be down again..?
box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org