Andreas wrote:
I am not interesting in arguing.
+1
Things seem to have improved significantly from when I last looked at it, which is good news.
Yes. I will try to keep this separate metacello config for vmmaker maintained, but as I said I need a minimal support from vm-maintainers side to get notified when load order or packages change. Thanks in advance!
David wrote:
I'm also happy to see the Metacello support, because it will make VMMaker more accessible from images that do use Metacello.
Thank you. Yes that was the goal. If a project is easy accessible more people are able to use it or learn or help.
Thanks Torsten
vm-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org