On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:07:06 +0800 Ben Coman btc@openinworld.com wrote:
Intended usage is not a semaphore. Intended usage is a mutual exclusion primitive (i.e. a lock)
exclusiveAccess acquire
$0.02, -KenD
I update slice with renames to OwnedLock. We discussed names at Sprint
2016-01-21 2:12 GMT+01:00 KenD Ken.Dickey@whidbey.com:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:07:06 +0800 Ben Coman btc@openinworld.com wrote:
Intended usage is not a semaphore. Intended usage is a mutual exclusion primitive (i.e. a lock)
exclusiveAccess acquire
$0.02, -KenD
cool. I'll take another look. cheers -ben
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Denis Kudriashov dionisiydk@gmail.com wrote:
I update slice with renames to OwnedLock. We discussed names at Sprint
2016-01-21 2:12 GMT+01:00 KenD Ken.Dickey@whidbey.com:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 08:07:06 +0800 Ben Coman btc@openinworld.com wrote:
Intended usage is not a semaphore. Intended usage is a mutual exclusion primitive (i.e. a lock)
exclusiveAccess acquire
$0.02, -KenD
vm-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Ben Coman -
Denis Kudriashov -
KenD