On 28.10.2018, at 20:52, tim Rowledge tim@rowledge.org wrote:
On 2018-10-28, at 12:37 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
The only thing I'd like to see in Tonel is per-method timestamps a la
[snip]
but I know there is active opposition to this idea.
Why on earth is there any opposition to what appears a perfectly reasonable idea? Within, of course, the context of an idea I find rather daft, that of trying to force Smalltalk source code into a model that seems completely at odds.
I think the reasoning is that the time stamp can trivially reified from the VCS history (ie, git blameā¦) The data is still there, yet no more completely tied to the code.
Best regards -Tobias
PS: also, the time stamp format we use up until now is not very portable (in a i18n kind of way)