On 10/16/2016 6:55 PM, Robert Withers wrote:
On 10/16/2016 6:37 PM, tim Rowledge wrote:
On 16-10-2016, at 3:20 PM, Nicolas Cellier nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com wrote:
that's because most of us let that job to bots nowadays…
For goodness’ sake, think of the electrons! Don’t waste bits; remember there are children offline in less-affluent parts of the world.
Tim, doesn't that depend on the selected theme? Standard black fonts on a white background ought be saving electrons. But, well, that's due to more of a Dirac mindset rather than a potential cat. Just be positronic!
Yes, that's
( β m c 2 + c ( ∑ n = 1 3 α n p n ) ) ψ ( x , t ) = i ℏ ∂ ψ ( x , t ) ∂ t {\displaystyle \left(\beta mc^{2}+c\left(\sum _{n{\mathop {=}}1}^{3}\alpha _{n}p_{n}\right)\right)\psi (x,t)=i\hbar {\frac {\partial \psi (x,t)}{\partial t}}} \left(\beta mc^{2}+c\left(\sum _{n{\mathop {=}}1}^{3}\alpha _{n}p_{n}\right)\right)\psi (x,t)=i\hbar {\frac {\partial \psi (x,t)}{\partial t}}
so you see, electrons are conserved when you hide them. 'His colleagues in Cambridge defined a unit of a "dirac", which was one word per hour.'. If you worry about the paucity of offline children, give them little carpets so they make their own electrons then, I am meaning 'teach them how to fish'. :_)
tim
tim Rowledge;tim@rowledge.org;http://www.rowledge.org/tim I came, I saw, I deleted all your files.
Veni, Vidi, deleri omnem lima