On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
OK, in the end I decided on primitive number 169. It doesn't waste the 150-159 range and is in amongst primitiveAdoptInstance and primitiveSetIdentityHash. David, would you like to integrate this into the main branch?
If dynamic frequency is low, why does it need to be a primitive?
Colin