On November 30, 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
On 30.11.2009, at 05:44, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
I installed latest firmware Q3A16, and the latest build 47 (confirmed it shows that way in the control panel)
Went to update software, Etoys showed as updating:
From version 100 to 108
So that seems still wrong. After update, the /home/olpc/Activities/Etoys.activity/activity.info reports activity_version=100, which is also weird, because when running Etoys, they report vuild 2337 which from what I can tell is Etoys112.
I just forgot to update the XO bundle version at
http://etoys.laptop.org/xo/11.0/
The latest, as you noticed, is 112:
The .xo bundle did not change at all between these versions (in fact, not for a year or so). The only file that changes in it is the NEWS file. I should stop updating the bundle because it is unnecessary - new etoys versions for the XO require a new rpm, not a new xo bundle. I just don't have a good idea what the versioning scheme for the bundle should look like.
I guess Etoys.activity (and everything below) should typically remain the same for future releases, but does that mean the os and the activity updater is ignoring version numbers from the activity.info? I understand from here:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9459
that the version number stored in /etc/olpc-release defines that the updater will look into http://etoys.laptop.org/xo/11.0 for the version number corresponding to that release. But the link points to 108 - as you said I assume that should be updated but probably does not matter, but how does the activity updater in control panel know where to look for the latest version, does it simply look for the latest Etoys-ijk.xo in
http://etoys.laptop.org/rpms/?C=M;O=D ?.
Anyway, I do not understand the XO activity versioning, and whether to report any problem with the updater, in the 46 version it was reporting wrong versions on update, but now is fine, without any of the numbers (in activity.info, /etc/olpc-release, and http://etoys.laptop.org/xo/11.0)
being changed....
Sorry for these long questions, ignore it unless there is a simple known explanation :)
Thanks,
Milan
Is it just me, and is trac on http://dev.laptop.org/query still the right place to report OS issues?
That's the place.
Milan
Thanks for testing!
- Bert -
etoys-dev mailing list etoys-dev@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev