Numbers are in seconds, horizontally we see the zipping methods and vertically three different projects. On a clean 3.0 image, loaded with our customizations and luke's speed patch.
pr pr.gz.zip0 pr.zip0 pr.zip pr.gztr 37 1:20 1:29 1:29 46 c10 30 1:15 1:23 1:23 40 shp 18 30 32 36 20
where tr, c10, shp are different projects
pr = non-gzipped stand-alone .pr file pr.gz.zip0 = gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive pr.zip0 = non-gzipped .pr file in uncompressed zip archive pr.zip = non-gzipped .pr file in compressed zip archive pr.gz = gzipped stand-alone .pr file
I just reformatted your table for my own understanding. So apparently avoiding the zip-archive part is paramount for performance. We should figure out what's actually taking so long there ...
Yes. a stand-alone .pr file would lose a few other files in the archive, right? I would hope that we can find a way to make "pr.zip0" or "pr.zip" perform almost as fast as "pr"...
-- Yoshiki