So one more "need" I forgot: The ability to run from a USB stick on Mac/Windows/Linux (ie: Etoys to Go Etoys-to-Go is so cool and useful.
Cheers, Stephen
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Steve Thomas sthomas1@gosargon.com wrote:
So following up on Alan's quote:
"Better" and "Perfect" are the enemies of "What Is Needed"
Let me voice one opinion on what is needed:
- The ability to run in a Browser
- The ability to run on Mobile Devices (IPhone/Android)
importantly the ideas they could explore an learn using Etoys) if they could in a matter of an hour create a iPhone/Android app?
- How many more kids would be turned onto Etoys (and more
- The ability to run on Tablets (iPad/Android Tablet)
- The ability to run without an Internet connection
restrictions 2. Also the ability to run from USB would be great (I love Etoys to Go)
- I am thinking about XO deployments and schools with Internet
- The ability to run ~97% of existing Etoys projects
lot of the features of Etoys 2. We could run the utility Bert created for me a while back to determine which Scripting tiles (and object?) are in a project to scan through the Etoys Illinois projects and get an idea on what would be the "basics" to start with. I can help with that (the scripting anyway) if needed. 3. I wouldn't mind a tool to "convert" existing Etoys projects to "Javascript Etoys" projects. We could run a converter and provide both versions in a single click from the Etoys Illinois site and also to allow folks to convert their existing projects. 4. Books and Playfields are one addition I can think of immediately that would be needed 5. Only concern would be Kedama, I would hate to lose that.
- My guess is the vast majority of Etoys projects do not use a
Some thoughts on the enemies of "Better" and "Perfect"
- Authoring Always On
iPhone/Android, hmmm 2. We can probably get a "runnable" version of Etoys (ie: no getting Halos or scripting) on iPhone/Android a lot faster than a "Authoring On" version that would frustrate all but those with the smallest fingers, pin point dexterity and the patience and perseverance of of a Saint. 3. By what date do we realistically expect Apple to "see the light" and allow authoring on version of Etoys?
- Better/Perfect yes, Realistic and Needed on the screensize of an
- We need a Good design for a Touch Interface
to deploy a runnable version on iPhone/iPad/Android. Still we would need a "Touch interface" to work for "non authoring" gestures. (I obviously need to think about this more)
- Agreed, but how long will this take, do we need to wait for this
Build on top of Snap or Lively or ??? (like most things I am NOT an expert here, but that never stopped me from thinking about it and voicing my opinion :) Both Snap and Lively Kernel run on my Android, but both had issues which would need to be addressed. The one thing I like about Lively (and perhaps this could be added to Snap) is the ability to add Java Script to do what you wanted. This is a nice feature and would guess would attract more developers.
I really like the scripting tile interface in Scratch/BYOB (colore tiles, tile shapes, snap-a-bility and flaps) as compared to the scripting tiles and viewers in Etoys.
Cheers, Stephen
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Harness, Kathleen kharness@illinois.eduwrote:
Jecel, 97%, sounds good to me. There are early projects from 7 or 8 years ago that are not as well done as the later ones. As I became a better teacher, so too did my student's projects.
I do not understand all the steps a visitor to our site would need to take to get one of those projects to open. The fewer steps the better, the fewer roadblock hurdles to get over the better especially for young children or cautious adult beginners. Have a good weekend, it is sunny and cool here. Regards, Kathleen ________________________________________ From: etoys-dev-bounces@squeakland.org [etoys-dev-bounces@squeakland.org] on behalf of Jecel Assumpcao Jr. [jecel@merlintec.com] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:37 PM To: etoys-dev@squeakland.org dev Subject: Re: [etoys-dev] Etoys in Javascript
Kathleen Harness wrote:
Let's keep "compatibility with current projects" at the top of our
requirements
for the changes to Etoys being considered here.
I fully agree with that priority. Note that we were talking about a completely new Etoys and not a changed one. I was just trying to make clear what the cost of the different options are.
I know Bert mentioned this recently and I am very grateful that he
values what
we have been doing here in Illinois.
If the library collection of projects on EtoysIllinois will not run
in Etoys it would
be the end of us. We can not meet again with the hundreds of students
who
made those projects.
The example projects and lesson materials were developed in
classrooms and
reflect years of experimentation with project ideas that make
programming
relevant to young children's interests and knowledge.
Yes, that is far more important than any specific Etoys feature in my opinion as well. In the Squeak community, after Edgar De Cleene it is likely that I have been the most vocal about keeping old stuff working.
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
would converting the projects be okay? Meaning, suppose the "Javascript
Etoys"
couldn't read the old project files directly, but there was a way to
export a project
from Squeak Etoys into another file that could be imported by
Javascript Etoys,
would that be sufficient?
That sounds like an interesting plan. I had only though about putting all of the conversion work in the new system, but it is true that some things are easier to do inside the original system. It might be the case that getting 100% of the projects converted is really hard but 97% is reasonably easy. It would be a good idea to find out, specially if the 3% turn out not to be among the most important projects.
-- Jecel
etoys-dev mailing list etoys-dev@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev _______________________________________________ etoys-dev mailing list etoys-dev@squeakland.org http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev
--
To some of us, writing computer programs is a fascinating game. A program is a building of thought. It is costless to build, weightless, growing easily under our typing hands. If we get carried away, its size and complexity will grow out of control, confusing even the one who created it. This is the main problem of programming. It is why so much of today's software tends to crash, fail, screw up.
When a program works, it is beautiful. The art of programming is the skill of controlling complexity. The great program is subdued, made simple in its complexity.
- Martin Harverbeke (from Eloquent JavaScripthttp://eloquentjavascript.net/index.html
)