On 07.12.2009, at 07:27, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
On December 3, 2009, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
Now development on 0.88 started, and there is a long thread on the Sugar dev list about changing the activity version numbers from a single integer to a more common major.minor scheme. I'll hold off sending this other mail until the discussion is settled (though you may start thinking about what version numbers we'd like to use for the Etoys activity).
Do you meant to change the versioning from sequential (113, 114 etc) to something else, or just which Etoys version - 4.0, 4.1 (dr geo?) , 5.0 - to target for 0.88?
The former.
- Bert -