I tested World Stethoscope on the B1 machine. It works pretty good, given that the hardware is still in beta. It seems that the noise level is somewhat high so tht actual input sometimes doesn't pick up the actual input, but that happens only when, for example, the input to the light sensor is too weak, etc. The viewer's readouts don't update themselves that often (we set #stepTime smaller), but if you use the readout from WS in a script and tick it, it does follow the input with relatively low latency.
Just FYI.
-- Yoshiki
Hello, Ohshima-san,
Thank you for your testing. If the noise frequency is fixed, you can cut off that by high-pass or low-pass filter. Try [pass under] or [pass over] tile in sound category. If not, you may change the recording level more higher. But I don't know how you can do that (Suger UI?).
And I think I can reduce the cost of each step. Please wait future updates.
Best regards, Kazuhiro Abe
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:30:59 -0800 Yoshiki Ohshima yoshiki@squeakland.org wrote:
I tested World Stethoscope on the B1 machine. It works pretty good, given that the hardware is still in beta. It seems that the noise level is somewhat high so tht actual input sometimes doesn't pick up the actual input, but that happens only when, for example, the input to the light sensor is too weak, etc. The viewer's readouts don't update themselves that often (we set #stepTime smaller), but if you use the readout from WS in a script and tick it, it does follow the input with relatively low latency.
Just FYI.
-- Yoshiki
etoys-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org