Hi,
Is Monticello storing a complete snapshot everytime it is saved? If so is this not a potential performance problem?
Thanks for any info or pointers to more information.
Anders
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:26:12AM +0200, Anders Janmyr wrote:
Hi,
Is Monticello storing a complete snapshot everytime it is saved? If so is this not a potential performance problem?
yes, and yes
Matthew,
Thanks for the quick reply. Does anyone actually have performance problems with large Monticello-projects?
Anders
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Matthew Fulmer tapplek@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 06:26:12AM +0200, Anders Janmyr wrote:
Hi,
Is Monticello storing a complete snapshot everytime it is saved? If so is this not a potential performance problem?
yes, and yes
-- Matthew Fulmer -- http://mtfulmer.wordpress.com/ _______________________________________________ Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
Am 25.08.2008 um 09:50 schrieb Anders Janmyr:
Matthew,
Thanks for the quick reply. Does anyone actually have performance problems with large Monticello-projects?
Depends.
In daily application development I find it to not be a problem, even if it takes a few seconds to load or save a single large package.
Where it becomes an issue is if you have multiple packages that you frequently need to update, which can take many minutes. This happens if you collaborate in a larger project (ask the Sophie team) or try to maintain a whole image (ask the 3.9 guys). There are workarounds (like in Tweak we introduced MC configuration maps that can load server- generated incremental packages) but they're not well-established.
- Bert -
beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org