On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:51:39PM -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
I'll second that. We need to see more *serious* interest in running this community or it will fade into moribundity.
I love this community. I'll run for board. The biggest thing I want to make happen is serious compatibility between croquet and the squeak release. I also want a lot more communication between the board and the wider community. I can do that.
So, I'll volunteer as a board candidate
On 19/02/2008, Matthew Fulmer tapplek@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 03:51:39PM -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
I'll second that. We need to see more *serious* interest in running this community or it will fade into moribundity.
I love this community. I'll run for board. The biggest thing I want to make happen is serious compatibility between croquet and the squeak release. I also want a lot more communication between the board and the wider community. I can do that.
So, I'll volunteer as a board candidate
I've been asked by Ron to step up as a potential member of newly formed Technical board. My primary concern is to improve VM, make it shiny and polished, and don't canonize it too much. To be appeal for developers, squeak should show a constant progress in this area as well. We are at the rise of multi-core era, and squeak should respond on that with own, ultimate ways :) So, if you so dare to see some innovation in VM vote for me :)
beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Igor Stasenko -
Matthew Fulmer