Ok...so we sort of got Ubuntu running on a server...which VM should I go get?
(Yes, I am so NOT "Linux-enabled" at this particular time...)
Thanks!
Rob
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Rob Rothwell r.j.rothwell@gmail.com wrote:
Ok...so we sort of got Ubuntu running on a server...which VM should I go get?
(Yes, I am so NOT "Linux-enabled" at this particular time...)
Hi Rob.
It depends on your architecture. If you're just running on 32-bit x86, you can just use the latest Linux VM from http://www.squeak.org/Download. Here's a direct link, because I'm such a nice guy and my browser is open on it anyway:
http://ftp.squeak.org/3.10/unix-linux/Squeak-3.10-1.i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.gz
IIRC there may be a VM that is installable from Ubuntu's package manager. That would work as well.
If you installed the AMD64 bit version of Ubuntu, then things are a bit trickier. Then you'll need to look at http://www.squeakvm.org/.
Gulik.
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 18:07 -0400, Rob Rothwell wrote:
Ok...so we sort of got Ubuntu running on a server...which VM should I go get?
(Yes, I am so NOT "Linux-enabled" at this particular time...)
Easiest is to use the one in ubuntus multiverse. If you have enabled "multiverse" in your software sources an
aptitude install squeak-vm
should do.
Norbert
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Norbert Hartl norbert@hartl.name wrote:
Easiest is to use the one in ubuntus multiverse. If you have enabled "multiverse" in your software sources an
aptitude install squeak-vm
should do.
Thanks...I can tell I am about to need "Ubuntu for Dummies!"
Rob
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Rob Rothwell r.j.rothwell@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Norbert Hartl norbert@hartl.name wrote:
Easiest is to use the one in ubuntus multiverse. If you have enabled "multiverse" in your software sources an
aptitude install squeak-vm
should do.
This worked very well once we got a terminal up and running and so on...thanks! I was able to move my development image from a Windows laptop right onto a dual processor 64 bit Ubuntu box and have my Aida website running just as advertised! Very impressive!
Now we just have to finish our application...
Rob
Rob Rothwell-2 wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Rob Rothwell r.j.rothwell@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:32 AM, Norbert Hartl norbert@hartl.name wrote:
Easiest is to use the one in ubuntus multiverse. If you have enabled "multiverse" in your software sources an
aptitude install squeak-vm
should do.
This worked very well once we got a terminal up and running and so on...thanks! I was able to move my development image from a Windows laptop right onto a dual processor 64 bit Ubuntu box and have my Aida website running just as advertised! Very impressive!
Now we just have to finish our application...
Rob
Hi Rob,
What do you get for SmalltalkImage current vmVersion please? When I use apt-get or Synaptics I seem to get the 3.7 vm.
Thanks, ...Stan
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:50 AM, stan shepherd squeak414@free.fr wrote:
Hi Rob,
What do you get for SmalltalkImage current vmVersion please? When I use apt-get or Synaptics I seem to get the 3.7 vm.
It says:
'Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]'.
If it matters, I am running the Desktop version of Ubuntu, 8.04 LTS, 64 bit version...
Rob
Rob Rothwell-2 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:50 AM, stan shepherd squeak414@free.fr wrote:
Hi Rob,
What do you get for SmalltalkImage current vmVersion please? When I use apt-get or Synaptics I seem to get the 3.7 vm.
It says:
'Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021]'.
If it matters, I am running the Desktop version of Ubuntu, 8.04 LTS, 64 bit version...
Rob
Interesting, I moved to the version on the Squeak downloads site; it is 'Squeak3.10beta of 22 July 2007 [latest update: #7159]'.
Upgrading the VM got rid of a nasty bug where closing the Squeak window exited immediately, even if you had unsaved changes or were in the middle of saving.
I suppose it's time to upgrade Ubuntu as well.
...Stan
beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org