Browse senders of #subclassResponsibility, and look for objects in your hierarchy. You can use a Method Finder to do this.

Looking myself, I see only 340 or so senders. Which is what I'd expect; there aren't a whole lot of abstract classes in the image; most are real.

-- C

On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Felix Dorner felix_do@web.de wrote:

Hi,

I am playing around with Morphs to create a Board for the ancient Go game. Given that I'd like to create a completely new kind of Morph (i.e. a Class that extends Morph), I'd like to find out which methods in the Morph class are defined as subclass responsibilities. Is there any fast way to do such a kind of search?

Thanks, Felix

---

Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners

I am playing around with Morphs to create a Board for the ancient Go game. Given that I'd like to create a completely new kind of Morph (i.e. a Class that extends Morph), I'd like to find out which methods in the Morph class are defined as subclass responsibilities. Is there any fast way to do such a kind of search?

You can happily evaluate the following:

Morph new openInHand

and the instance of Morph is fully operational in the system. This means that you don't have to treat it as an abstract class; it is a concrete class from which you can make your own subclasses.

For a search, you can do:

(SystemNavigation default allCallsOn: #subclassResponsibility) select: [:ref | ref classSymbol = #Morph]

and you don't get any, I believe.

-- Yoshiki