Hi,
I like to bootstrap an image with my own application. Until now I had a base installation of the application and did an upgrade with a script provided at the command line.
I use
repo := (MCDirectoryRepository new directory: (FileDirectory on: repositoryPath) ). (repo loadVersionFromFileNamed: releaseFile) load.
Now I'm trying to do a bootstrap without having the application installed. But the way I use it Monticello is unable to resolve dependencies to file them in. How can I provide Monticello with information where it can find the files to resolve the dependencies?
thanks,
Norbert
Norbert Hartl wrote:
How can I provide Monticello with information where it can find the files to resolve the dependencies?
For Sophie we use config maps, not dependencies.
You have to have all needed repositories already setup in the image though for config maps to work.
Michael
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 12:31 +0200, Michael Rueger wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
How can I provide Monticello with information where it can find the files to resolve the dependencies?
For Sophie we use config maps, not dependencies.
You have to have all needed repositories already setup in the image though for config maps to work.
I read a few times people speaking of config maps. But to be honest I've no glue what it is. And I have trouble finding some valuable information how to use them.
thanks,
Norbert
Norbert Hartl wrote:
I read a few times people speaking of config maps. But to be honest I've no glue what it is. And I have trouble finding some valuable information how to use them.
a quick google digs up this one: http://tweakproject.org/ABOUT/FAQ/MCConfigurationUpdates/
Has nothing really to do with tweak ;-)
Michael
Para los que como yo , no saben todos los misterios de Moticello, hoy vino esta información útil
El 8/2/07 8:21 AM, "Michael Rueger" m.rueger@acm.org escribió:
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 13:21 +0200, Michael Rueger wrote:
Norbert Hartl wrote:
I read a few times people speaking of config maps. But to be honest I've no glue what it is. And I have trouble finding some valuable information how to use them.
a quick google digs up this one: http://tweakproject.org/ABOUT/FAQ/MCConfigurationUpdates/
Has nothing really to do with tweak ;-)
Ok, nice tool. In principal exact what I was looking for. Unfortunately it doesn't support directory repositories and it that way.
thanks,
Norbert
Ok, nice tool. In principal exact what I was looking for. Unfortunately it doesn't support directory repositories and it that way.
Hi Norbert,
Attached is a simple change set that will allow it to mostly support directories (I've been using it personally for a while now - there are undoubtedly places where there are holes). Basically, it removes the protections that were put in to not use Directories. If you think about it, using directory repositories for configurations is a really bad idea - if you share the config with someone else, they can't get to your repositories. Heck, if the directory is local on your machine and you switch to another machine, they configuration isn't even useful for yourself.
That said, this will allow you to do it if you still want too.
-Chris
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 14:48 -0700, Chris Cunningham wrote:
Ok, nice tool. In principal exact what I was looking for. Unfortunately it doesn't support directory repositories and it that way.Hi Norbert,
Attached is a simple change set that will allow it to mostly support directories (I've been using it personally for a while now - there are undoubtedly places where there are holes). Basically, it removes the protections that were put in to not use Directories. If you think about it, using directory repositories for configurations is a really bad idea - if you share the config with someone else, they can't get to your repositories. Heck, if the directory is local on your machine and you switch to another machine, they configuration isn't even useful for yourself.
That said, this will allow you to do it if you still want too.
Thanks, I'll give it a try. I partially agree that using directory repositories is not the best idea. But in my opinion if you have source code which isn't public it is a really bad idea to use http repositories. So our team uses diretory repositories which we sync via unison over ssh to a central server. I had a look at HttpSocket und HttpsSocket to get https repositories into monticello but I'm not the most experienced squeaker nor do I have enough time to get deep enough into it.
thanks very much,
Norbert
Hi. I'm trying to create a simple chat connection between Croquet and Second Life, and it seems the most safe way to do this (to avoid leaking private IM into a Croquet island) is to simply let Squeak display the text i/o outside of Croquet.
So... how do I send a message to squeak and pass one back out of squeak?
This seems a fundamental thing to do, but I'm not sure how to start..
Thanks.
Lawson English.
beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Chris Cunningham -
Edgar J. De Cleene -
Lawson English -
Michael Rueger -
Norbert Hartl