No, actually no.
But the background to my question (which I didn't mention since it doesn't belong to this list) is that I was dealing with a Seaside issue in which one string's newlines came back with CR+LF (carriage return and line feed) and under other conditions it came back as having LF+LF.
I wanted to construct a String for these exact sequences and do the appropriate replacement (that is replace all LF+LF ocurrences for CR+LF).
I am very glad that in Smalltalk it's possible to write a string-literal like you did (with a newline in-between).
2009/2/2 Ken G. Brown kbrown@mac.com:
Is there something wrong with just doing:
string := 'Hello There'.
?
Ken G. Brown
For your particular need (normalizing line breaks), use:
aString withSqueakLineEndings
That gives you a defined line end convention, suitable for use with other methods like linesDo:.
HTH
Matthias
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Nozzi sebnozzi@googlemail.com wrote:
No, actually no.
But the background to my question (which I didn't mention since it doesn't belong to this list) is that I was dealing with a Seaside issue in which one string's newlines came back with CR+LF (carriage return and line feed) and under other conditions it came back as having LF+LF.
I wanted to construct a String for these exact sequences and do the appropriate replacement (that is replace all LF+LF ocurrences for CR+LF).
I am very glad that in Smalltalk it's possible to write a string-literal like you did (with a newline in-between).
2009/2/2 Ken G. Brown kbrown@mac.com:
Is there something wrong with just doing:
string := 'Hello There'.
?
Ken G. Brown
Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners
beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Matthias Berth -
Sebastian Nozzi