Hi,
The idea is that you should _maybe_ give the superclasses of Strand a chance to execute their method. In some situations this is really necessary, or just a good way to avoid code duplication.
HTH
Matthias
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:47 PM, stan shepherd squeak414@free.fr wrote:
Hi, I get the possible bug 'Overrides super method without calling it' for things like:
Strand>>size ^ genes size
I can't find an explanation of this, in case there is some nasty that I'm not aware of. It is not listed at:
http://st-www.cs.uiuc.edu/users/brant/Refactory/LintChecks.html
Is there a more complete list of code critics messages?
Are there cases other than 'Overrides a "special" message' to look out for?
Thanks, ...Stan
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Code-critics---Overrides-super-method-without-calling-... Sent from the Squeak - Beginners mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners