Hi,
the @ method is not specific to Squeak. I guess it has been included in the earliest versions of Smalltalk already.
I don't know about any other Squeak-specific syntax (apart from arrays).
If you're concerned about portability of your code to other Smalltalk dialects then you might want to have a look at how the Seaside project handles it. They have some tool that finds problematic code.
Cheers
Matthias
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Mark Volkmann mark@ociweb.com wrote:
I know that the syntax for literal and dynamic arrays is specific to Squeak. Is the @ method in the Number class for creating Point objects specific to Squeak? Is there any other syntax that is specific to Squeak?
Mark Volkmann
Beginners mailing list Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners